$QUACK vs $BURNIE: social heat, real people, market size
RichQuack has a Heat Score of 83 with 6 contributors in 24h; Burnie Senders scores 78 with 122. $BURNIE has 20.3× the human conversation of $QUACK, while $QUACK is 1.2× larger by market cap.
| Metric | $QUACK | $BURNIE |
|---|---|---|
| Heat Score | 83 (On fire) | 78 (On fire) |
| Contributors 24h | 6 | 122 |
| Interactions 24h | 910 | 48.1K |
| Posts 24h | 7 | 430 |
| Sentiment | 100/100 | 96/100 |
| Spam share 7d | 19.4% | 6.2% |
| Price | $0.000000000037 | $0.001444 |
| 24h change | +8.3% | -20.6% |
| Market cap | $1.62M | $1.40M |
| Rank | #1572 | #1612 |
| From all-time high | -99.8% | -94.1% |
| Age | 5.2 years old | 5 months old |
| Chain | bnbchain, solana | solana |
| DEX liquidity | $20.49K | $252.57K |
| CEX listings | 0 | 1 |
| Social dominance | 0.001% | 0.089% |
Both columns come from the same sources at nearly the same time (this page: Aug 31, 02:19 UTC; Burnie Senders: Sep 5, 01:56 UTC). Heat measures conversation, not value.
Where $QUACK stands in the memecoin rankings
$QUACK is not in a MemeHeat top 10 right now — the rankings below show who is.
Other memecoins you may want to check
Compare side by side: $QUACK vs $USELESS · $QUACK vs $ASS · $QUACK vs $CLIPX · $QUACK vs $MARSCOIN · $QUACK vs $MILO