$QUACK vs $USELESS: social heat, real people, market size
RichQuack has a Heat Score of 83 with 6 contributors in 24h; USELESS COIN scores 100 with 302. $USELESS has 50.3× the human conversation of $QUACK, while $USELESS is 162.8× larger by market cap.
| Metric | $QUACK | $USELESS |
|---|---|---|
| Heat Score | 83 (On fire) | 100 (On fire) |
| Contributors 24h | 6 | 302 |
| Interactions 24h | 910 | 935.5K |
| Posts 24h | 7 | 545 |
| Sentiment | 100/100 | 65/100 |
| Spam share 7d | 19.4% | 24.8% |
| Price | $0.000000000037 | $0.2628 |
| 24h change | +8.3% | +32.8% |
| Market cap | $1.62M | $264.41M |
| Rank | #1572 | #169 |
| From all-time high | -99.8% | -39.9% |
| Age | 5.2 years old | 5.4 years old |
| Chain | bnbchain, solana | bnbchain, solana |
| DEX liquidity | $20.49K | — |
| CEX listings | 0 | 15 |
| Social dominance | 0.001% | 0.112% |
Both columns come from the same sources at nearly the same time (this page: Aug 31, 02:19 UTC; USELESS COIN: Sep 5, 06:13 UTC). Heat measures conversation, not value.
Where $QUACK stands in the memecoin rankings
$QUACK is not in a MemeHeat top 10 right now — the rankings below show who is.
Other memecoins you may want to check
Compare side by side: $QUACK vs $USELESS · $QUACK vs $ASS · $QUACK vs $CLIPX · $QUACK vs $MARSCOIN · $QUACK vs $MILO